Feedback on 11/27/2002 03:42 PM CST
Links-arrows 1
Reply Reply
We give feedback about spells but receive no notification of any of it being considered. Would be nice to know that things are not falling on deaf ears.


Arctuniol
Reply Reply
Gm Feedback on 12/11/2002 10:50 AM CST
Links-arrows 5
Reply Reply
Just got finished reading a couple of the magic folders and I was extremely surprised on the VAST (compared to this folder) feedback from the gms.

Creative ideas being passed back and forth, positive feedback being given from BOTH sides. Yes there are a few you suck and gawd you're ruining the game post, but the majority are informative post with a lot of information and feedback being passed back and forth.

I think it's really UNFAIR that in this folder there is little to no gm interaction and suggestions fall onto deaf ears. Dmack does as much as he can with field some questions but lets face it the man is already stretched across almost all systems and is one of the busiest and most informative gm's out there (big props Dmack).

Neways back to what I was talking about. What is wrong with giving some type of feedback to some of the issues at hand? I know the Bm's give weekly reports with most of the issues from each folder? Is it too much to ask to at the very least respond to the weekly reports like you did with the MOF issue?

Let us know that our concerns/ideas/testing are being heard and all of our hard work isn't being don't for nothing.

Thanks
Reply Reply
Re: Gm Feedback on 12/11/2002 11:16 AM CST
Links-arrows 6
Reply Reply
I sometimes wonder if Life Magic doesn't get the attention of Elemental, Lunar and Holy because there is no primary magic guild for it. Perhaps they want to focus on the guilds that have magic as a primary function before working on those with only secondary and tertiary needs.

Shaunn
Reply Reply
Re: Gm Feedback on 12/11/2002 11:42 AM CST
Links-arrows 7
Reply Reply
>> I think it's really UNFAIR that in this folder there is little to no gm interaction and suggestions fall onto deaf ears.

Just because there aren't GM posts does not imply the suggestions are falling on deaf ears. The information does get to the right folks. An example would be the change GM Rigby made to Vitality Heal just today (likely due to a thread here and without having need to post in the thread specifically).

While I do understand what you are asking for, there are a few reasons why were are currently in the position we are with the number of GM posts. It doesn't necessarily have to do with posts in the last month (or even two months).

>> Let us know that our concerns/ideas/testing are being heard and all of our hard work isn't being don't for nothing.

More GMs than you know do read the boards. The voice is being heard. Not all of them are comfortable with stepping out and posting (for a variety of reasons).

GM Damissak
Reply Reply
Re: Gm Feedback on 12/11/2002 12:28 PM CST
Links-arrows 8
Reply Reply
>More GMs than you know do read the boards. The voice is being heard. Not all of them are comfortable with stepping out and posting (for a variety of reasons).

Faelyth smooches Damissak & Rigby! Thanks guys.
Reply Reply
Re: Gm Feedback on 12/12/2002 01:38 AM CST
Links-arrows 9
Reply Reply
More GMs than you know do read the boards. The voice is being heard. Not all of them are comfortable with stepping out and posting (for a variety of reasons).
GM Damissak
__

Thanks DMack!
Reply Reply