I didn't come over here originally cause I read this as just a IC garbage place and I felt what I was saying was alot of both IC and OOC. I guess it doesn't matter though, so I'm going to try to respond as well as I can. I guess what I'm saying is to expect references to both in my response.

---

<<<I wasn't even gonna bother with this until someone else pointed out to me that you (Tea) were referring to me and my post. Next time please name me specifially so I don't have to guess, I have alot of better things to do then be wondering how I managed to insult someone again.>>>

<< Sounds to me like you have lost your ever lovin mind. As you said 'We'd talked" so... how could you listen to SOMEONE??? and then make assumptions ANY of my words were directed to you? Amazing gift you have for filtering out crap from thin air.

It's quite possible I've lost my mind. Some days are better then others though. Ya know the first time I read your original post, I thought it was about me. Then I was like, nah that ain't right and forgot about it. Then awhile later I get an IM from someone telling me they thought that post was about me and specifically pointed out this reference I made in my post in Responses.
<<Just wanna also throw out here my opinion on this whole choosing a couple bards to attend this meeting... I think it's garbage. I felt it was a popularity contest and alienated alot of people that care about what's going on but no one knows them because they aren't popular.

Notice where I mentioned people caring? Then your post states:
<<The idea that some bards *"care more"* about the story or success of the guild doesn't hold water either.

I admitted I'm very paranoid, but taken that yours immediately followed mine, mentioning things discussed and your whole attitude of not going to be involved anymore - you can honestly tell me that there's nothing there AT ALL given the circumstances to make me think that I have cause to wonder? Am I overly sensitive? Yep. I'd much rather be this way then the type of person that never stops to think about someone else. And no, I'm not saying you are that type of person. I'm just using it as a comparison.

<<My statements were all directed to the situation and in the GM response folder, Gee... could I have been responding to the GM? hmmmmm Maybe so.

Ok.

<<I have one thing left to say, and that is, had Tea been "Invited" (thought it was some kind of vote? No I did not campaigne) I hope I'd have had the backbone to say "Thanks but no thanks, the idea , sucks, gonna cause people to distrust, and have a significant disadvantage on gaining persepective from hearing anything of what appears to be important information first hand. I just don't want to read someone elses "cleaned up" log. Sorry. ANd I don't want to start an IM detective search for the log in the first place. If meetings have a distruption problem , silence the meeting (not politicaly correct to call it a meeting? how about a Gathering? or or how about a propaganda event? :) or what ever.


I've read this paragraph alone like twenty times, I still don't know what your trying to say in the first half. If you had been one chosen, you would have turned it down? Is that what yer saying? Right...Moving on, the rest I get. Other then posting a cleaned up log of the event, assuming we'll even be allowed to, what are the other options to getting the info out, aside from posting and sporadic retelling by the people present? Oh I know! Let's all put on a play and we'll act out what happened! Imagine the good times and fun there! Snag yer spots now people, these prime acting roles will be going fast.

<<I realize its my opinion, and guess what? I realize I'm fully intitled to it. And so sorry to say, it had absolutly nothing to do with you Ms Matrina. I'd double check my sources if I were you.

Yes you are Tea, there was never any doubt or question about that. I'm overjoyed this has nothing to do with me, I can go back to hunting now. I'll also be letting my sources know what morons they are too, thanks for the advice.