kifocus stam cost. on 01/08/2016 01:11 PM CST
Hey, seeing alot of discrepancy's about kifocus stamina cost.
http://www.play.net/gs4/info/maneuvers/list.asp#ki says 15 Stamina
gswiki says Cost 30 (-10 Rank 1, -5 Rank 2) Stamina
however whenever I use it, with 3/3 ranks, it costs me 24 stamina...
I'd love to use this more, but there's no way at 24 stamina
Re: kifocus stam cost. on 01/08/2016 01:37 PM CST
Re: kifocus stam cost. on 01/08/2016 05:05 PM CST
Re: kifocus stam cost. on 01/08/2016 05:32 PM CST
Re: kifocus stam cost. on 01/08/2016 05:59 PM CST
VANKRASN39 |
That's a lot of pressure to put on the player base. I would prefer to have official spell and maneuver descriptions again. |
Please don't ever feel obligated or pressured to update anything on the wiki. While we are extremely appreciative for the work a few of you do, there is no expectation that you guys keep up with each and every (or any, for that matter) release.
Only onsite can update most things on the play.net website, so one of main reasons we've shifted to the GSWiki as the authoritative source is because staff members (and players, should they wish to help out) can instantly update it. I'll start pressuring my team to be proactive in updating it with new releases (i.e. spell updates, etc) going forward.
GameMaster Estild
Re: kifocus stam cost. on 01/09/2016 05:56 AM CST
>Nowadays, we consider the GSWiki the authoritative source for spells, maneuvers, and mechanical topics.
Wiki entries normally refer readers to play.net. e.g. Ki focus on the wiki was updated when the manoever was changed but the link to the out of date information on play.net was left there.
>I'll start pressuring my team to be proactive in updating it with new releases (i.e. spell updates, etc) going forward.
They need to take out links to out of date play.net pages when they update the wiki. The wiki seems to link to play.net by default, and might still be the right thing to do when a new page is created by a player on the basis of play.net information, but it needs to be stripped when the wiki is updated by dev.
Wiki entries normally refer readers to play.net. e.g. Ki focus on the wiki was updated when the manoever was changed but the link to the out of date information on play.net was left there.
>I'll start pressuring my team to be proactive in updating it with new releases (i.e. spell updates, etc) going forward.
They need to take out links to out of date play.net pages when they update the wiki. The wiki seems to link to play.net by default, and might still be the right thing to do when a new page is created by a player on the basis of play.net information, but it needs to be stripped when the wiki is updated by dev.
Re: kifocus stam cost. on 01/09/2016 07:51 AM CST
Re: kifocus stam cost. on 01/11/2016 10:40 AM CST