Re: 635 fury on 02/22/2017 08:12 AM CST
Re: 635 fury on 02/22/2017 08:52 AM CST
Re: 635 fury on 02/22/2017 12:16 PM CST
I would say a player friendly version should at the very least require CHANNEL and hard RT.
Keith/Brinret/Shiun
Keith is correct
Wyrom, APM
http://forums.play.net/forums/GemStone%20IV/Help%20for%20Players/Policy%20Discussions/view/246
Keith/Brinret/Shiun
Keith is correct
Wyrom, APM
http://forums.play.net/forums/GemStone%20IV/Help%20for%20Players/Policy%20Discussions/view/246
Re: 635 fury on 02/22/2017 12:36 PM CST
Re: 635 fury on 02/22/2017 06:38 PM CST
I would like to pitch my vote in with the "player-friendly-only" crowd of voices, OR permitting the caster to choose by means of using a different verb.
I would like to similarly pitch in my vote to update the other high-level Semi-list open-casting deadly-to-passersby spell in precisely the same manner. (If the GMs are feeling nice... use the verbs in the same way. If they're feeling malicious... switch 'em. :)
And yes, I'm referring to Sonic Disruption/1030. I've smoked at least 2, maybe 3-4 people, up in Thanatoph in the last 6 months.
(My efforts at safety are not helped by having to train myself OUT of doing my standard 'yell' of warning before renewing. Since yelling up there is liable to trigger a landslide, and, you know. Hurt me.)
I would like to similarly pitch in my vote to update the other high-level Semi-list open-casting deadly-to-passersby spell in precisely the same manner. (If the GMs are feeling nice... use the verbs in the same way. If they're feeling malicious... switch 'em. :)
And yes, I'm referring to Sonic Disruption/1030. I've smoked at least 2, maybe 3-4 people, up in Thanatoph in the last 6 months.
(My efforts at safety are not helped by having to train myself OUT of doing my standard 'yell' of warning before renewing. Since yelling up there is liable to trigger a landslide, and, you know. Hurt me.)