UAC berserk on 11/10/2016 01:55 PM CST
Links-arrows 1
Reply Reply

Any indications that UAC inplemntation and berserk are in the works. UAC is highly usable as a warrior but not having it function with berserk is quite crippling. Any insight would be appreciated on whether this is being worked on or not.
Reply Reply
Re: UAC berserk on 11/10/2016 04:52 PM CST
Links-arrows 2
Reply Reply


Not really a complaint, request, critique, or anything, but more just a musing on my part. I think UAC berserk would be severely inadequate mostly based on a nonexistence of combat features, ie, biting, and clawing, etc, that I see someone who's in a rage-state doing without a weapon. Not to mention other things that do exist, but are cmans, headbutts, charging, etc. That's how it would play in my mind, at least.
Reply Reply
Re: UAC berserk on 11/10/2016 05:11 PM CST
Links-arrows 3
Reply Reply
Please consider adding this feature to Berserk. Even trying to Berserk defensively out of status effects is a huge liability since there is a chance you will end up flailing ineffectively with the outdated empty-handed attacks.
Reply Reply
Re: UAC berserk on 11/10/2016 05:22 PM CST
Links-arrows 4
Reply Reply
I agree 100% that someone in a rage state would be doing headbutts, haymakers and other select combat manuevers as we know them. The same can be said for all weapon styles actually and the brute force combat manuevers not to mention all the warcries.
Reply Reply
Re: UAC berserk on 11/10/2016 09:42 PM CST
Links-arrows 5
Reply Reply
Giacomo envisioned WG Berserk more as a monomaniacal unrelenting focus, than as an emotional rage, when he released it.
Reply Reply
Re: UAC berserk on 11/17/2016 03:01 PM CST
Links-arrows 6
Reply Reply


Bump, any hopes or thoughts oh wise and wonderful GMs?
Reply Reply
Re: UAC berserk on 03/15/2017 07:56 PM CDT
Links-arrows 7
Reply Reply
This would be ridiculously overpowered (ie: so much fun!). As such, i'm completely in favor of it. +1
Reply Reply