Previous Thread
Expand All
Collapse All
Ignore Author
Reply
This is about grave robbing, and the Policy behind it.
Made up scenerio to try to understand the policy behind it. If at anytime someone thinks this is "bad" yank it. Won't be the first time :)
Scenerio:
Person A comes in. Person B and A exchange words. Person C gets into the argument and Person A-C exchange words. Person A and C leave, come back and Person A kills Person B. (That is an unconsented death?)
Person B comes back, opens grave, and person A grabs a bunch of high priced items from Person B's Grave. Person B assists, and GM A says, you have consent, enjoy. Person B gathers lynch mob to find Person A. Person A dies by Person B. Person B digs grave, and Person A comes back and starts clearing grave. Person B gets some items, but not all of them. (Consent still in affect?)
Person A runs off and does the whole hide run thing. Person B finds Person A, and Person A kills Person B again. Person D kills Person A and Person A assists an unconsented kill. GM A gives Person D a warning. Person A dies 5 times from Spirit Drain, and GM A tells Person A to grab their stuff and run so they don't get hit again. (Huh?)
GM A saves Person A from walking (The spirit hit wasn't happening like usual), and Person A says they'll give back items. Person A says it's a BUG. (Could be?) Person B shows up saying I just want my items, and it's done. Person A leaves the area. Person E-G watch Person A through a Mirror. Person A and B talk. Person A says they'll give back the stuff, when they contact feedback due to something being damaged cause of deaths. (If you're gonna grave rob, you should know the consequences?).
Person B says, just the stuff, that's all. Person A says, Nope, when I get my damaged item restored, you get your items. Person A says, It's your fault, I was teaching you a lesson. Person B says, just my stuff is all I want, and I'm done with it. Person A keeps talking until TIMER is up on Grave Robbed items and logs. GM A logs 10 Seconds after Person A logs, and was the GM watching over the whole thing.
Person B reports, GM B and C say, this isn't an emergency, and it's not Mech Abuse for logging. Once they log back in, you can go at it again.
So what exactly can someone do in this situation? If Person B feels like they got shafted, can Person B write Feedback about the way the situation was handled by the Management?
Just wondering is all.
Shalrin (Ottavion)-- Monk of Folly
Don't understand the post, then you don't understand me.
__
Shalrin says, "Just PFE"
Shalrin looks over his shoulder nervously.
* Shalrin was just struck down!
First, the best course of action is feedback for player B (I hate inocuous labels, would have been easier just to say the names).
Second, y'all might or might not be reading something into the timely departure of GM A, and if you are, there could be very good reasons for the time s/he left. They were probably about to log when the whole sitution escalated to a point where they had to step in... or your suspicions are correct. There's just no way to tell without more information than we are privy to.
Third, the whole situation makes me sick.
Visionary Heroiklim Zortal
Heiu says, "By the end of the year I expect to see an explosion"
Heiu says, "Hold me to that if you want.... at Christmas"
Second, y'all might or might not be reading something into the timely departure of GM A, and if you are, there could be very good reasons for the time s/he left. They were probably about to log when the whole sitution escalated to a point where they had to step in... or your suspicions are correct. There's just no way to tell without more information than we are privy to.
Third, the whole situation makes me sick.
Visionary Heroiklim Zortal
Heiu says, "By the end of the year I expect to see an explosion"
Heiu says, "Hold me to that if you want.... at Christmas"
