Previous Thread
Expand All
Collapse All
Ignore Author
Reply
I’ve been playing my bard again and really wish he had access to the VTs from thieves. I’ve always wished that the two guilds could teach each other their respective VTs. It seems silly to limit them when realistically they should be able to do both. So maybe thieves could teach theirs to bards as well? Thoughts?
Monster Elec
Community first. Guild always.
I don’t mind guilds sharing things when there’s precedent. Slip is an example. Thieves and Rangers and Necros all have it but get the different ones at different times. Even if the bard/thief model worked like that. It would just be an easy “freebie” but if dev that is already mostly there. Just need to cross the right wires.
Monster Elec
Community first. Guild always.
Monster Elec
Community first. Guild always.
I always appreciate guild level distinctions, but this is one that as a decade+ long bard makes me a bit crazy.
Why do thieves not just get the benefit of Bardic VT teachers, but get VTs that are arguably more interesting and RP oriented than the guild that has performance and a hard req?
I'd be 100% onboard with both making VT something more accessible to thieves while also giving bards access to the FULL complement of a skill based on voice.
Player of Ryken
---
"Life expectancy would grow by leaps and bounds if green vegetables smelled as good as bacon." ~ Doug Larson
AIM - RykenDR
Why do thieves not just get the benefit of Bardic VT teachers, but get VTs that are arguably more interesting and RP oriented than the guild that has performance and a hard req?
I'd be 100% onboard with both making VT something more accessible to thieves while also giving bards access to the FULL complement of a skill based on voice.
Player of Ryken
---
"Life expectancy would grow by leaps and bounds if green vegetables smelled as good as bacon." ~ Doug Larson
AIM - RykenDR
