Previous Thread
Expand All
Collapse All
Ignore Author
Reply
Are there any GMs who are currently "in charge" of Alchemy? Are there any plans, even long, long term, to address the current issues with the system?
And as a secondary question, why do some recipes require WHOLE versions of a stone (like luck talismans and green malachite stones)? Whats the point of having the gem for sale in the alchemy shop if its not even usable in the recipes? And if thats the case, are there any plans to allow a formula to re-constitute a powdered gem?
<<Are there any GMs who are currently "in charge" of Alchemy?>>
Over a week with no response? That's not a good sign. I'd also like to know this, because I've been going over some old notes of mine and have received recent information that brings up an old issue I had with Asenora in the Icemule sorcerer guild.
<<...are there any plans to allow a formula to re-constitute a powdered gem?>>
I'd also like to see this implemented. It would be a process with complexity, naturally, and that complexity would be relative to the value of the gem.
Some response would be nice, even if it's just "Pssh yah right in your dreams!"
)O(Mikaela)O(
Speaking in Guildspeak, Kastrel softly says, "Well, based on my past two months . . ."
Speaking in Guildspeak, Kastrel softly says, "The future of Sorcery has wings."
Over a week with no response? That's not a good sign. I'd also like to know this, because I've been going over some old notes of mine and have received recent information that brings up an old issue I had with Asenora in the Icemule sorcerer guild.
<<...are there any plans to allow a formula to re-constitute a powdered gem?>>
I'd also like to see this implemented. It would be a process with complexity, naturally, and that complexity would be relative to the value of the gem.
Some response would be nice, even if it's just "Pssh yah right in your dreams!"
)O(Mikaela)O(
Speaking in Guildspeak, Kastrel softly says, "Well, based on my past two months . . ."
Speaking in Guildspeak, Kastrel softly says, "The future of Sorcery has wings."
