208 on 10/15/2010 10:24 AM CDT
Links-arrows 1
Reply Reply
Is 208 using any formula to grant additional duration to spells stolen and cast in this way?




"The abuse of greatness is when it disjoins remorse from power" - William Shakespeare
Reply Reply
Re: 208 on 10/15/2010 10:27 AM CDT
Links-arrows 2
Reply Reply
I don't think so. You just get base duration.
Reply Reply
Re: 208 on 10/15/2010 11:40 AM CDT
Links-arrows 3
Reply Reply
ROB
I don't think so. You just get base duration.


Correct.

GameMaster Estild
Cleric/Empath Team
Reply Reply
Re: 208 on 10/15/2010 11:43 AM CDT
Links-arrows 4
Reply Reply
That's what I thought was the case, but I wasn't sure.

Would it be possible to apply the same logic as the scroll use formula to increase duration, Estild, considering the inherent difficulty in aquiring spells using 208? A little more reward for the potential risk, and all that.




"The abuse of greatness is when it disjoins remorse from power" - William Shakespeare
Reply Reply
Re: 208 on 10/15/2010 11:54 AM CDT
Links-arrows 5
Reply Reply
>Would it be possible to apply the same logic as the scroll use formula to increase duration, Estild, considering the inherent difficulty in aquiring spells using 208? A little more reward for the potential risk, and all that. - Ceyrin

What do you think would be a better fit? Tying it to existing 200's spell ranks using the MIU/ArcS formula, or some sort of a boost via a lore (Likely Blessings)? For what it's worth, I definitely agree with you that this spell needs improvement.




Evarin and his Mis'ri
Reply Reply
Re: 208 on 10/15/2010 12:05 PM CDT
Links-arrows 6
Reply Reply
The spell already has an arcane symbols aspect to it. Arcane symbols raises the RS (Rune Strength) of the caster. I think it should pretty much mirror the scroll formula for increasing duration. If it needs to be more balanced than that, it could give half the benefit using the same formula.

As it stands, the spell allows for the inclusion of lore benefits, but doesn't extend duration based on any formula. While I am definately happy that it has the ability to include lore benefits, I think it's a little cart before the horse.




"The abuse of greatness is when it disjoins remorse from power" - William Shakespeare
Reply Reply
Re: 208 on 10/15/2010 12:26 PM CDT
Links-arrows 7
Reply Reply
So you think Arcane Symbols ranks should count for duration? I suppose the precedent would be 1750, but I think that is more likely due to you not being able to train in the Arcane Circle. That, and I always thought Empaths/Clerics needed more reasons to train up their 200's circle. This certainly wouldn't be worth it alone, but one more drop in the bucket wouldn't hurt.




Evarin and his Mis'ri
Reply Reply
Re: 208 on 10/15/2010 12:34 PM CDT
Links-arrows 8
Reply Reply
>>I always thought Empaths/Clerics needed more reasons to train up their 200's circle. This certainly wouldn't be worth it alone, but one more drop in the bucket wouldn't hurt.

I agree, I like the idea of the 200s training better than the AS for any chance at increased duration. There are a lot of great spells in the 200s list that I think people forget about.




Get Lich - http://www.lichproject.org/
Vote for Gemstone - http://www.topmudsites.com/vote-gemstone.html
Reply Reply
Re: 208 on 10/15/2010 12:44 PM CDT
Links-arrows 9
Reply Reply
LORDKRIP
Would it be possible to apply the same logic as the scroll use formula to increase duration, Estild, considering the inherent difficulty in aquiring spells using 208? A little more reward for the potential risk, and all that.


I'm not sure I like the idea of extending the duration of stolen spells. The spell already has a questionable abuse status when used between players. If it was it happen, it'd probably only be for PvC.

GameMaster Estild
Cleric/Empath Team
Reply Reply
Re: 208 on 10/15/2010 01:06 PM CDT
Links-arrows 10
Reply Reply
>>I'm not sure I like the idea of extending the duration of stolen spells. The spell already has a questionable abuse status when used between players<<

I'm not really sure I understand how one precludes the other from happening. The people who want to do what you term abuse to this system via MA's or friends are going to, regardless of the duration they get per cast.

That being said, I have no real intention of persuing this matter further if you don't believe it's in the best interests of the spell as it exists currently.




"The abuse of greatness is when it disjoins remorse from power" - William Shakespeare
Reply Reply
Re: 208 on 10/15/2010 01:34 PM CDT
Links-arrows 12
Reply Reply
LORDKRIP
I'm not really sure I understand how one precludes the other from happening. The people who want to do what you term abuse to this system via MA's or friends are going to, regardless of the duration they get per cast.


Correct, but it would make their job easier.

GameMaster Estild
Cleric/Empath Team
Reply Reply
Re: 208 on 10/15/2010 05:53 PM CDT
Links-arrows 13
Reply Reply
I think it is not duration, but CS or AS boosts that fit this best.

How about when you steal a spell off a critter, you also steal some of its ability to cast it, so you can use it with an enhanced CS or AS? Or how about the penalty for using spells on yourself getting applied to the critter when a stolen spell was cast back at it?
Reply Reply
Re: 208 on 10/15/2010 06:46 PM CDT
Links-arrows 14
Reply Reply
RATHBONER
How about when you steal a spell off a critter, you also steal some of its ability to cast it, so you can use it with an enhanced CS or AS?


That idea definitely has potential, but probably should be globally applied for all magical items (trinkets, scrolls, etc). And it would only be for CS and maneuver formulas since all characters can train in skills to effectively raise AS.

GameMaster Estild
Cleric/Empath Team
Reply Reply
Re: 208 on 10/22/2010 11:45 AM CDT
Links-arrows 15
Reply Reply
You gesture at XXXXXXX.
CS: +418 - TD: +73 + CvA: +12 + d100: +40 - +5 == +392
Warding failed!
[Rune Strength 66 - 49 Steal Spell Difficulty = 17]
As you concentrate and begin chanting, a luminescent aura lashes out to encircle XXXXXX.
XXXXXXX gasps in agony as the aura completely envelops her.
The aura grows brighter then disappears in a brilliant flash.You feel the surge of magic depart.
You seem to glow with power and the knowledge of XXXXXXXXXXX.
Cast Roundtime 3 Seconds.


I imagine having 515 removed is intentional, but I would be remiss if I didn't ask and post.

So, is the removal of 515 upon successful theft of a spell via 208 intended?




"The abuse of greatness is when it disjoins remorse from power" - William Shakespeare
Reply Reply
Re: 208 on 10/22/2010 12:41 PM CDT
Links-arrows 16
Reply Reply
LORDKRIP
So, is the removal of 515 upon successful theft of a spell via 208 intended?


Yes.

GameMaster Estild
Cleric/Empath Team
Reply Reply
Yet Another Living Spell(208) Improvement Thread on 12/01/2010 09:39 AM CST
Links-arrows 17
Reply Reply
I know this is a horse beat to death, but I would very much like to see this spell gain the ability to harvest mana from stolen spells. It SOUNDS like it can be abused, but this would be very easily curtailed by having a timer on how often one can do it. Twenty Minutes is more than enough time to ensure that this function is not abused, but I would rather a diminishing returns system kick in like Mana Leech. Obviously, I do not expect the spell to garner as much mana as Leech, but even partial returns on stolen spells would be a dramatic improvement IMO.
Reply Reply
Re: Yet Another Living Spell(208) Improvement Thread on 12/04/2010 07:13 AM CST
Links-arrows 18
Reply Reply
I think it would be cool if it was an EITHER/OR situation. You cast 208 and steal a spell successfully (which can be hard enough by itself), then you either have a choice; cast the spell, or CONSUME it for mana.




"The abuse of greatness is when it disjoins remorse from power" - William Shakespeare
Reply Reply