Previous Thread
Expand All
Collapse All
Ignore Author
Reply
Edited slightly for language...
[Table]
[LNet]-DR:Anonymous: "We have a PVP stance. You can be closed, guarded or open. Open is "whatever", Guarded is (typically) "I want you to RP with me a little before you put it in my posterior" and closed is "I don't want to pvp. nor should i be doing anything to incite it either, unless im a feminine personal hygiene device""
[/table]
Can we have something like this? I think it would be potentially helpful for a lot of players. It would make it a more proactive (instead of the current) reactive system.
"The abuse of greatness is when it disjoins remorse from power" - William Shakespeare
Count me in for something like this. I do not think it should be mechanically enforced, just something they can see either on profile or with a separate verb to get an idea where we stand.
AIM: GS4Menos
>Here lies the formless world we´re living in
>Gravity is finally giving in
>High altitudes and still upward we go
>I was never meant to lead but to follow
AIM: GS4Menos
>Here lies the formless world we´re living in
>Gravity is finally giving in
>High altitudes and still upward we go
>I was never meant to lead but to follow
I also think DR's version requires a wait time between toggling the flag back and forth. I would like to see that brought over as well. If this isn't mechanically enforced, then I suppose there is no need. If so, then there should be restrictions placed upon its use that prevents abuse and/or misuse.
Evarin and his Mis'ri
Evarin and his Mis'ri
