Throw weapon maneuver & throwing blade question on 12/10/2013 09:58 PM CST
Links-arrows 1
Reply Reply
Still wondering if thrown weapons will get a maneuver. It would be nice.

Also is RT for throwing blades going to be changed at all? Currently I get 9 seconds throwing a 5 stack of throwing blades, it seems a bit high, but maybe it would be worth it when forged blades possibly come out? To add to that I get 9 seconds per 5 blades with lob and hurl both. Maybe lighten the RT a little bit for the lob version?
Reply Reply
Re: Throw weapon maneuver & throwing blade question on 12/10/2013 11:46 PM CST
Links-arrows 2
Reply Reply


I dunno but all I gotta say is this:

You see a Dragon Priest intercessor.
The Dragon Priest intercessor has faint scuffing to the right arm, faint scuffing to the left arm, faint scuffing to the right leg, faint scuffing to the left leg, faint scuffing to the right hand, faint scuffing to the chest, faint scuffing to the abdomen, faint scuffing to the back.
There is a dull black steelstar lodged shallowly in its back, a dull black steelstar lodged shallowly in its left leg, a dull black steelstar lodged shallowly in its left arm, a dull black steelstar lodged shallowly in its right hand, a dull black steelstar lodged shallowly in its right arm, a dull black steelstar lodged shallowly in its chest, a dull black steelstar lodged shallowly in its right leg, a dull black steelstar lodged shallowly in its chest, a dull black steelstar lodged shallowly in its back, a dull black steelstar lodged shallowly in its right hand, a dull black steelstar lodged shallowly in its left arm, a dull black steelstar lodged shallowly in its left leg, a dull black steelstar lodged shallowly in its left leg, a dull black steelstar lodged shallowly in its left arm, a dull black steelstar lodged shallowly in its back.
The Dragon Priest intercessor is in good shape.
It is wearing some grey leather armor with a diagonally-patterned black and white tabard, some metal bracers.
It is carrying a single-edged sword.

::sigh:: that was not worth the 36 seconds it took.
Reply Reply