Re: A bit backwards on 03/16/2007 12:47 PM CDT
Links-arrows 82
Reply Reply
Leathers are made from tanned versions of their hides :) scraping and rubbin lotions in probably screws with the properties.




So you wanna learn how to be a barbarian huh?
http://phiiskeep.homestead.com/Barbarian.html
has everything you need to know :)

(Free advertising for Phii yay)
Reply Reply
Re: A bit backwards on 03/16/2007 02:45 PM CDT
Links-arrows 83
Reply Reply
Scraping and rubbing probably releases all the magical goodness.


Farewell, remorse: all good to me is lost; Evil, be thou my good.
~Paradise Lost (bk. IX, l. 171)
Reply Reply
Re: A bit backwards on 03/16/2007 04:55 PM CDT
Links-arrows 84
Reply Reply
I'm posting late because I forgot to post when I found out, I believe around 4 days ago, this past Monday I asked Aiwix to focus on my cloak and he told me it had strong magicla properties. Would a GM please tell me if a camo cloak is considered magical? I was under the impression for many years that a camo cloak was camoflauge like the ones used in the military.

l at cloak
The combination of a number of green and brown shades surely makes the wearer of this cloak blend into the wilderness easier. The cloak has seen better days, with its many small rips and frayed hem.

tap cloak
You tap a battered cloak dyed in a green camouflage pattern that you are wearing.

You turn your battered cloak.
You blend into the shadows more easily.

I can't understand how this cloak is magical, please tell me it isn't so.

This does lead me to take sides with Galren slightly, in the sense that the messaging is misleading when as far as focusing on it. I can roar/dance/berserk while the cloak is turned and as you can see from the different verbs used there are no signs of the cloak having magical properties. I really like the cloak as an rp tool and would hate to having to stop using it because it's magical. Catullus doesn't even like friendly spells because I rp as never having to rely on magic and I don't appreciate being associated with it in anyway.

Executioner Catullus
Reply Reply
Re: A bit backwards on 03/16/2007 05:03 PM CDT
Links-arrows 85
Reply Reply
If the item was simple camo coloring, and it boosted stealth as it does, they would be MUCH more common than they are in the game. Every clothing merchant in the game would be making camo clothing.

Farewell, remorse: all good to me is lost; Evil, be thou my good.
~Paradise Lost (bk. IX, l. 171)
Reply Reply
Re: A bit backwards on 03/16/2007 06:01 PM CDT
Links-arrows 86
Reply Reply
Well the cloak is remored as I remember from many years ago to boost hiding/stalking around 30 ranks each. I have never really noticed an increase in hiding ability, I use it more because of the rp but this cloak if it does boost stealth is has to be by far the lowest stealth boosting ability in game hence why I thought it was not magical or it would boost it much higher. Either way I think according to old test that panther boost stealth around 40-50 ranks when capped. If anything I can resort to using panther, shrugs. Either way, I like because it suits my race, being a reptile and all, given the game doesn't have any mechanics built into the races.


Executioner Catullus
Reply Reply
Re: A bit backwards on 03/16/2007 06:12 PM CDT
Links-arrows 87
Reply Reply
>>The balance issues I think if you tried to debate that this cloak is capable of being a pocket handy version of khri silence is staggering. That could mean there might be cloaks one day capable of giving the wearer a natural 'berserk' effect, etc.

Actually, the word 'berserker' comes from the Old Norse word 'berserkr'. It referred to the a bears skin that was worn by Viking warriors. The Vikings believed they would inherit the strength and ferocity of the bear if they wore it's skin. Although it probably didn't really give them any more strength or fighting ability, the psychological impact it had on the warriors was substantial.

-Gavyn



"When a true genius appears in the world, you may know him by this sign, that the dunces are all in confederacy against him."
Reply Reply
Re: A bit backwards on 03/16/2007 08:27 PM CDT
Links-arrows 88
Reply Reply
Yes thats were the term and idea comes from but in DR, thats not how it is portrayed. To make it sound clearer; if a garment of clothing could let a non barbarian utilized a barbarian dance, that would be similar.

Per the camo cloak..if it was natural why does it have charges? Seems magical:) Just cleverly disguised is all.




Farewell, remorse: all good to me is lost; Evil, be thou my good.
~Paradise Lost (bk. IX, l. 171)
Reply Reply
Re: A bit backwards on 03/17/2007 12:51 AM CDT
Links-arrows 89
Reply Reply
Well first off, barbarians do have attunement. Probably a mechanics limitation on that, I don't know. Easily tested with an achaedi crystal.

Game balance is probably the reason on berserking and all that stuff with polo cloaks.

The roaring and dancing is just tied to any kind of invisibility it doesn't care about the source from the messaging.

Berserking might also just be triggering off the invisibility status, I don't know since I am not aware of any barb-usable 100% non-magical inviso available for testing. Also the stench of magic messaging pre-dates roars and dances.

From what I can tell, barbarians can use things that are self-contained, meaning the power source and magic or magic-like effects are in one package.

Barbarians cannot use items which draw upon their surroundings, wands/rattles/etc..., nor items which require inherent magical knowledge like runes.

Some items are self-contained and extend into the user, cjs for example, and others are self-contained but do not extend into the individual, apple seed bracelet, polo cloaks, etc...

Personally I think the items which extend into the invidual should cause problems, this will be handled in the future by MD rank penalties since the items which extend into the user teach MD.

Items which don't extend into the user, I think should be left up to the invidual barbarian.

Navak doesn't hate magic, he doesn't even really dislike magic, it just isn't for him. MR, and BMR, has nothing to do with how a person views magic.

I am --- Navak
Reply Reply
Re: A bit backwards on 03/17/2007 02:10 AM CDT
Links-arrows 90
Reply Reply
I thought camo cloaks didn't really have charges? last I remember they were unlimited, now if they do have charges, then that would explain the reason I have not noticed any visible stealth bonus haha, the jokes would be on me.

t
Executioner Catullus
Reply Reply
Re: A bit backwards on 03/17/2007 11:56 AM CDT
Links-arrows 91
Reply Reply
Camo cloaks, as I have been told (never owned one, due to this) have a set amount of charges. After that point they give no benefit. The only 'chargless' item that gives some real benefit to my knowledge is the polo cloak, which seems to suck up mana between castings from the local area and then requires a downtime after use. Nifty idea which really could be applied to other rare items. Maybe not give 'invisibility though'. Anything chargless and ergo infinite (within context) really has to be balanced very carefully.


Farewell, remorse: all good to me is lost; Evil, be thou my good.
~Paradise Lost (bk. IX, l. 171)
Reply Reply
Re: A bit backwards on 03/17/2007 08:18 PM CDT
Links-arrows 92
Reply Reply
Polo cloaks don't have a downtime, unless you mean the recharge time which most people never even run into, and I'm not 100% sure that the recharge thing is even intentional.

I am --- Navak
Reply Reply
Re: A bit backwards on 03/17/2007 11:19 PM CDT
Links-arrows 93
Reply Reply
I'm pretty sure its intentional. Should be a great deal longer as well, but this thread really isnt about the item being over powered or not, but its interaction as a magical device. Given the relative low level aspect of magical items in DR, a limitless source of instant invisibility is a shocking contrast. Even in a very magical item heavy environment like D&D people would consider that "broken" or very poorly balanced until higher levels (at which point mages are stopping time, etc).


Farewell, remorse: all good to me is lost; Evil, be thou my good.
~Paradise Lost (bk. IX, l. 171)
Reply Reply
Re: A bit backwards on 03/18/2007 02:51 AM CDT
Links-arrows 94
Reply Reply
Any GM's gonna comment as to whether or not the camoflauge cloaks are magical, so that I may ditch mine?


Executioner Catullus
Reply Reply
Re: A bit backwards on 03/18/2007 09:59 AM CDT
Links-arrows 95
Reply Reply
<<Any GM's gonna comment as to whether or not the camoflauge cloaks are magical, so that I may ditch mine?

No, thats not a question we are going to answer.

GameMaster Niamah
Barbarian Liaison

"Give them nothing, take from them, everything!"
Reply Reply
Re: A bit backwards on 03/18/2007 11:31 AM CDT
Links-arrows 96
Reply Reply
>>Any GM's gonna comment as to whether or not the camoflauge cloaks are magical, so that I may ditch mine?

It's completely magical. It's tainting your being every second you have it. I'll take it off your hands for a small fee.

-Gavyn




"When a true genius appears in the world, you may know him by this sign, that the dunces are all in confederacy against him."
Reply Reply
Re: A bit backwards on 03/19/2007 10:59 AM CDT
Links-arrows 97
Reply Reply
<<Camo cloaks, as I have been told (never owned one, due to this) have a set amount of charges. After that point they give no benefit.

They are not charged. I have 2. I use the one I'm wearing at least 30-40 times daily. If they are, in fact, charged than the number of charges is in the thousands. And Catallus, I notice a significant boost to stealth while using mine; I'd put the rank equivalent somewhere between 40-60 ranks. There are certain critters that can spot me when I snipe them; when I use the cloak, they don't spot me and I remain hidden.


__

She offered her honor.
He honored her offer.
And all night long,
It was honor and offer.
Reply Reply
Re: A bit backwards on 03/19/2007 01:27 PM CDT
Links-arrows 98
Reply Reply
I was under the impression for years it had a boost and it had no charges since it's a camofluage cloak not a magical invisibility one. I honestly, believe that when they coded the cloak for some strange reason since no non magical items gave boost at the time that it only made sense to have it be part of the magical system because according to all the looks and verbs it has no inherent magical property. I tested it again last night against someone that has almost the same perception as my stealth and when I turned the cloak and hid, it took any where from 3-8 searches to find me, so yeah you are right, the boost is around that ball park.

Poople hating on the cat's stealth and wanna punk me out of an item I have used for many years, for rp reasons since I train like a thief.


Executioner Catullus
Reply Reply
Re: A bit backwards on 03/19/2007 05:05 PM CDT
Links-arrows 99
Reply Reply
I've never had a cameo cloak and what I am about to say is based entirely on memory so it could certainly be off. Feel free to correct to your heart's content.

That being said, I seem to remember a board discussion several years about on cameo cloaks and after much talk and analyzing, it was concluded that there were two types that were almost identical but one was charged and one wasn't.
Reply Reply
Re: A bit backwards on 03/19/2007 07:48 PM CDT
Links-arrows 100
Reply Reply
Eh, just sounds like two overpowered items came out. I dont think they would make a glove that boosted your weapon skill with infinite charges.


Farewell, remorse: all good to me is lost; Evil, be thou my good.
~Paradise Lost (bk. IX, l. 171)
Reply Reply
Re: A bit backwards on 03/19/2007 09:24 PM CDT
Links-arrows 101
Reply Reply
>>Eh, just sounds like two overpowered items came out. I dont think they would make a glove that boosted your weapon skill with infinite charges.

Though there are roar helms that boost roar power without charges...



< You clamp your teeth on an arbelog's abdomen gnashing it with painful bites that cuts deeply into its groin.
An arbelog is moderately stunned!
An arbelog hisses out a whispered curse as it stumbles, falls, then dies.
[You're very badly balanced]
Reply Reply
Re: A bit backwards on 03/19/2007 09:34 PM CDT
Links-arrows 102
Reply Reply
Roars drain ..

Hiding and stalking doesn't
Reply Reply
Re: A bit backwards on 03/19/2007 09:52 PM CDT
Links-arrows 103
Reply Reply
Also roar cloaks that boosts roar defense without charges.


Vinjince




"There are five possible operations for any army. If you can fight, fight; if you cannot fight, defend; if you cannot defend, flee; if you cannot flee, surrender; if you cannot surrender, die."

- Sima Yi
Reply Reply
Re: A bit backwards on 03/19/2007 10:12 PM CDT
Links-arrows 104
Reply Reply
Roar Cloaks? (Sounds silly!). The cloaks are boosting a fundamental skill in the game, like...weapon skill or evasion. Roar helms are modifying a guild ability. I would see them as a weapon, a method of focusing your power. An infinite source of what (from what snooping around ive done)seems to be the "shadows" spell is overpowered, especially considering your non magical ways. It just seems like a convenient loop hole. Introduce an item with infinite charges + no skill check, able to boost stealth skills and have it not mess with a magic hating guild. That said, beyond the BMR aspect of things, I still think the items are overpowered and should really be given finite charges.


Farewell, remorse: all good to me is lost; Evil, be thou my good.
~Paradise Lost (bk. IX, l. 171)
Reply Reply
Re: A bit backwards on 03/19/2007 10:19 PM CDT
Links-arrows 105
Reply Reply
Someone must be bitter over the fact that stalking will no longer put you in our group and let you be free of roars. :P




-Galren Moonskin

Messenger Boy: The Thessalonian you're fighting... he's the biggest man I've ever seen. I wouldn't want to fight him.
Achilles: Thats why no-one will remember your name.
Reply Reply
Re: A bit backwards on 03/20/2007 04:57 AM CDT
Links-arrows 106
Reply Reply
Nope, I got over that. Giving out what is more or less free spell access, without limit, to anti magic guilds is what I'm not bitter over:) Giving out free stealth buffs without limit is really bad enough and should be reconsidered alone.


Farewell, remorse: all good to me is lost; Evil, be thou my good.
~Paradise Lost (bk. IX, l. 171)
Reply Reply
Re: A bit backwards on 03/20/2007 01:06 PM CDT
Links-arrows 107
Reply Reply
<<Roar Cloaks? (Sounds silly!).

They're actually pretty effective, all guilds can use them. You should get one, I'll sell you mine.


__
Reply Reply
Re: A bit backwards on 03/20/2007 07:24 PM CDT
Links-arrows 108
Reply Reply
Not to mention that the cloak for what we know might not offer anything, gm's don't want to comment about it but I'm sure they know what they are doing or they would have removed it from the game if it was a balance issue. Constantine stop hating, I don't hate on your 1 rt stalk which makes a huge difference nor on all your guild super boosting abilities on stealth/perception which are probably 3 times higher than any dance bonus on weapons, nor do I hate on the fact that your guild has bonuses to skills yet barbs have no weapon percs.


Executioner Catullus
Reply Reply
Re: A bit backwards on 03/20/2007 07:27 PM CDT
Links-arrows 109
Reply Reply
Oh and most importantly of all, I train like you train for your guild, the cloak doesn't really help someone that doesn't train heaily on stealth, because if they have 100, 200 or even 300 a cloak isn't going to help them much, now for us extremely stealthy non-thieves that have sacraficed a great deal of weapon ranks so that we may stalk well in the shadows it comes in handy quite a bit. I know if I would have used genie and the super scripts people use now a days I would have not had to sacrafice weapons but as an old school barb still using wizard and no real scripts that is what I had to do in order to excel in stealth so please stop hating on the blasted cloak that I have used since the beginning.


Executioner Catullus
Reply Reply
Re: A bit backwards on 03/20/2007 07:29 PM CDT
Links-arrows 110
Reply Reply
Oh and one last note, if any penalties are ever imposed for using the cloak because it ends up being magical then you can believe I will be the first to sell you it but as it stands a GM already refused to comment on it and I as well as others still believe that the cloak isn't really magical and will stand by it until told otherwise from the powers that be.


Executioner Catullus
Reply Reply
Re: A bit backwards on 03/20/2007 08:24 PM CDT
Links-arrows 111
Reply Reply
Catullus, even if the ONLY person you are conflicting with is yerself, take it to conflicts folder ;)


GameMaster Niamah
Barbarian Liaison

"Give them nothing, take from them, everything!"
Reply Reply
Re: A bit backwards on 03/20/2007 09:39 PM CDT
Links-arrows 112
Reply Reply
But but...we were enjoying watching Cat argue with himself!


War Hawk Maulem~

Read the Barbarian Seven!
http://tinyurl.com/gksan
Reply Reply