Previous Thread
Expand All
Collapse All
Ignore Author
Reply
Since the profession title is acquired at 30th circle, how come it so easy to get it in criminal? I've had the "Thief" title long ago in criminal and since I made 30th last night, I now have access to the professional one.
Why is it so easy to get that one? Shouldn't it be at least twice as many ranks that are needed since at that level of skill you aren't going to be stealing much without cookies besides really small things and getting caught often doing that?
Happiness stems only from violence. - The Stock
It's like putting a band-aid on cancer. - Philip Anselmo
<<Why is it so easy to get that one? Shouldn't it be at least twice as many ranks that are needed since at that level of skill you aren't going to be stealing much without cookies besides really small things and getting caught often doing that?>>
It looks like this title is in the table multiple times.
I'll look into it and consider getting it adjusted.
Solomon
What's going on?
http://www.livejournal.com/~drbubba
It looks like this title is in the table multiple times.
I'll look into it and consider getting it adjusted.
Solomon
What's going on?
http://www.livejournal.com/~drbubba
You're awesome, Bubba : ) Thank you!
Lis
P.S.
Other thiefy titles:
Enigma = thief of high level, high hiding
Scourger = high thief, stealing, high weapons
Pest = lower level thief
Nuisance = lower level thief
Deliquent = low-mid level thief
________________________________
GET SHIFTED: http://home.earthlink.net/~empathicshifting
Lis
P.S.
Other thiefy titles:
Enigma = thief of high level, high hiding
Scourger = high thief, stealing, high weapons
Pest = lower level thief
Nuisance = lower level thief
Deliquent = low-mid level thief
________________________________
GET SHIFTED: http://home.earthlink.net/~empathicshifting
Hey, Bubba, while we're talking about titles, there is one thing I'd like to see. And that is...
A guild requirement for guild-only skill titles.
For example, only Rangers should be able to wear the "Scouting Novice" title. Only Traders should be able to wear "Trading Aficionado" titles. Only Empaths should... you get the idea.
It really bugs me in particular because three-quarters of those who wear titles for guild-only skills belonging to guilds that they're not in... are wearing Backstabbing titles. Heck, I've even seen EMPATHS wearing "Backstabbing Novice" titles!
I know, titles are OOC. But still, there should be some limit to what they can proclaim. Theonly exception to this rule that I can conceive is to let thieves with a pretend guild use the titles for the guild-only skill for the guild they're imitating.
-Markhor
A guild requirement for guild-only skill titles.
For example, only Rangers should be able to wear the "Scouting Novice" title. Only Traders should be able to wear "Trading Aficionado" titles. Only Empaths should... you get the idea.
It really bugs me in particular because three-quarters of those who wear titles for guild-only skills belonging to guilds that they're not in... are wearing Backstabbing titles. Heck, I've even seen EMPATHS wearing "Backstabbing Novice" titles!
I know, titles are OOC. But still, there should be some limit to what they can proclaim. Theonly exception to this rule that I can conceive is to let thieves with a pretend guild use the titles for the guild-only skill for the guild they're imitating.
-Markhor
Oh, and don't take away the skills.
I don't mind if someone has a rank or two of a skill they're not supposed to have. They managed to earn it somehow, they should be able to keep it. But wearing a title for it should be out of the question unless they have proper access to the skill.
-Markhor
I don't mind if someone has a rank or two of a skill they're not supposed to have. They managed to earn it somehow, they should be able to keep it. But wearing a title for it should be out of the question unless they have proper access to the skill.
-Markhor
Titles have the unique property of having dual stated (fun quantum mechanics) they are both IC and OOC at the same time. Paradoxes are fun.
Yamcer
"You know, while I understand the importance of seeing the (personal) validity in other's arguments, it's impossible for me to believe fully that others are correct. If their argument was correct, I'd change mine." - My GF
Yamcer
"You know, while I understand the importance of seeing the (personal) validity in other's arguments, it's impossible for me to believe fully that others are correct. If their argument was correct, I'd change mine." - My GF
I personally don't have a problem with a thief wearing 'targetted magic novice' even though there's no current way for him to train those skills.
I figure that if they know the skill, let 'em have the novice title. It's not like I would suddenly be confused about his guild if Caraamon was wearing the 'Targetted Magic Novice' title.
-Durnil
I figure that if they know the skill, let 'em have the novice title. It's not like I would suddenly be confused about his guild if Caraamon was wearing the 'Targetted Magic Novice' title.
-Durnil
<<I personally don't have a problem with a thief wearing 'targetted magic novice' even though there's no current way for him to train those skills.>>
i have to respectfully disagree on the "no current way ... to train"
Targeted Magic: 132 89% learning
Yamcer
"You know, while I understand the importance of seeing the (personal) validity in other's arguments, it's impossible for me to believe fully that others are correct. If their argument was correct, I'd change mine." - My GF
i have to respectfully disagree on the "no current way ... to train"
Targeted Magic: 132 89% learning
Yamcer
"You know, while I understand the importance of seeing the (personal) validity in other's arguments, it's impossible for me to believe fully that others are correct. If their argument was correct, I'd change mine." - My GF
